Match statistics snapshot
- San Jose Earthquakes created the clearer chances on xG (2.73 vs 1.78, Δ 0.95).
- San Jose Earthquakes fired more attempts (20 vs 19 shots).
- San Jose Earthquakes was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2.73Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.78 |
| Offsides | ||
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 8 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 19 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 329 | Accurate passes | 483Lead |
| 404 | Total passes | 560Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.37 | Goals prevented | -0.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |