Match statistics snapshot
- San Jose Earthquakes created the clearer chances on xG (3.23 vs 1.15, Δ 2.08).
- San Jose Earthquakes fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Houston Dynamo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 3.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15 |
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 367 | Accurate passes | 392Lead |
| 435 | Total passes | 476Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |