Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (1.18 vs 2.35, Δ 1.17).
- San Jose Earthquakes fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.18 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.35Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 4Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 319 | Accurate passes | 511Lead |
| 389 | Total passes | 614Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.19 | Goals prevented | -1.19 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.