Match statistics snapshot
- San Jose Earthquakes created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 0.77, Δ 0.66).
- San Jose Earthquakes fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- New York Red Bulls was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 433Lead | Accurate passes | 300 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 397 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.40 | Goals prevented | -0.40 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |