Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 1.62, Δ 0.41).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.62Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 286 |
| 441Lead | Total passes | 365 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |