Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 2.16, Δ 0.73).
- San Jose Earthquakes fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.16Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 418Lead | Accurate passes | 351 |
| 497Lead | Total passes | 435 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.34 | Goals prevented | -0.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |