Match statistics snapshot
- San Jose Earthquakes created the clearer chances on xG (1.82 vs 0.69, Δ 1.13).
- San Jose Earthquakes fired more attempts (20 vs 7 shots).
- San Jose Earthquakes held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.69 |
| Offsides | ||
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 528Lead | Accurate passes | 316 |
| 609Lead | Total passes | 406 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.