Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 0.68, Δ 0.03).
- San Jose Earthquakes fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 504Lead | Accurate passes | 313 |
| 592Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |