Match statistics snapshot
- San Jose Earthquakes created the clearer chances on xG (2.63 vs 0.87, Δ 1.76).
- San Jose Earthquakes fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 2.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.87 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 427Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 496Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.10 | Goals prevented | -0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |