Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 2.23, Δ 1.21).
- Vancouver Whitecaps fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- San Jose Earthquakes was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.23Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 149 | Accurate passes | 492Lead |
| 227 | Total passes | 567Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.61 | Goals prevented | 0.61 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |