Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 0.96, Δ 0.12).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (8% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 1Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 419Lead | Accurate passes | 236 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 345 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |