Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (1.26 vs 2.82, Δ 1.56).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Ham-Kam held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 1.26 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.82Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 360 | Accurate passes | 404Lead |
| 421 | Total passes | 469Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Blocked shots | 7 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.61 | Goals prevented | -0.61 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.