Match statistics snapshot
- Sandefjord created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 0.50, Δ 0.73).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- KFUM Oslo held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 451Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 533Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sandefjord | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.