Match statistics snapshot
- Osters IF created the clearer chances on xG (1.40 vs 1.49, Δ 0.09).
- Osters IF fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Sandviken was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sandviken | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 1.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sandviken | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 346 |
| 425Lead | Total passes | 414 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sandviken | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sandviken | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sandviken | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.