Sandviken 1-2 Træff Prediction

SandvikenSandviken
1 — 2FT
TræffTræff
OverviewLineupsStatisticsStandingsEventsPlayersPredictionsFormInjuriesH2H

Updated

SandvikenSandvikenvsTræffTræff

Match DNA · Predictions ↗

Open / transitional — model leans Sandviken

Estimated win chances: Sandviken 48.4%, draw 23.9%, Træff 27.7%. From 10 and 10 competition matches.

TempoHigh
VolatilityLow
Expected goalsMedium
Tactical styleOpen / transitional
Upset potentialMedium
Draw riskMedium
Model confidenceHigh

Outcome model

Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.

Goal expectancy

1.70Expected goals1.23

From 10 and 10 competition matches

Likely scorelines (Poisson)

  • 1–111.6%
  • 2–19.9%
  • 1–09.4%
  • 2–08%
  • 1–27.1%

Form & momentum

Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.

42MixedSandviken
Weighted momentum

Sandviken carries the sharper recent run (+14 momentum).

28Cold spellTræff
Sandviken · leaky defenseTræff · low scoring · cold form

Sandviken

3W · 5D · 2L
Recent →DDDDDLWWWL
Momentum index

Træff

2W · 3D · 5L
Recent →DLLLWDLWDL
Momentum index

Form split comparison

Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window

Season record

League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.

Table gapSandviken +5

Sandviken

14 pts
30% wins

3W · 5D · 2L · 10 played

For
17
Against
17
Goal diff +0

Træff

9 pts
20% wins

2W · 3D · 5L · 10 played

For
10
Against
16
Goal diff -6

Season shape comparison

League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals

League depth signals

Extremes, discipline windows, and split stats from the full league profile.

Matchup edges

Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.

  • Sandviken offensive edge

    Sandviken's attack (64%) vs Træff's defense (44%).

    +20
  • Træff offensive edge

    Træff runs into a stronger home defensive profile.

    -20

Team comparison

Comparison indices from the match data partner.

Attack rating

Attacking threat in the final third.

Sandviken64
Træff36

Defense rating

How well each side limits chances.

Sandviken56
Træff44

Momentum

Weighted form score (recent results count more).

Sandviken42
Træff28

Matchup edge

Attack vs opponent defense (positive = favourable matchup).

Sandviken90
Træff10

Volatility

Higher = more swingy results (big losses, goals against).

Sandviken34
Træff32

Form index

Head-to-head form comparison from the model.

Sandviken56
Træff44

H2H pull

Historical dominance in recent meetings.

Sandviken0
Træff0
Sandvikenleaky defense
Træfflow scoring · cold form