Match statistics snapshot
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima created the clearer chances on xG (1.74 vs 0.96, Δ 0.78).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 1.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 349 | Accurate passes | 382Lead |
| 447 | Total passes | 486Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |