Match statistics snapshot
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima created the clearer chances on xG (0.82 vs 0.50, Δ 0.32).
- Fagiano Okayama fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 0.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 520Lead | Accurate passes | 161 |
| 608Lead | Total passes | 238 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |