Match statistics snapshot
- Kashima created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 1.83, Δ 0.66).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Kashima was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.83Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 365Lead | Accurate passes | 246 |
| 462Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.