Match statistics snapshot
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 0.55, Δ 0.82).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 339Lead | Accurate passes | 257 |
| 429Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.