Match statistics snapshot
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 9%).
- Nagoya Grampus held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 3Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 371 | Accurate passes | 440Lead |
| 456 | Total passes | 539Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |