Match statistics snapshot
- Both sides matched on xG (1.06 each).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Vissel Kobe was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.06 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 337Lead | Accurate passes | 317 |
| 435Lead | Total passes | 414 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.