Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (27 vs 5 shots).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 0%).
- Sao Paulo held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Águia De Marabá |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Águia De Marabá |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 531Lead | Accurate passes | 170 |
| 589Lead | Total passes | 232 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Águia De Marabá |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Águia De Marabá |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Águia De Marabá |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |