Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo created the clearer chances on xG (1.69 vs 0.62, Δ 1.07).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 1.69Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 426Lead | Accurate passes | 245 |
| 489Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -1.07 | Goals prevented | -1.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.