Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo created the clearer chances on xG (0.79 vs 0.71, Δ 0.08).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Ceara was more accurate in front of goal (86% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 0.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| Offsides | ||
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 435Lead | Accurate passes | 265 |
| 503Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.17 | Goals prevented | 0.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.