Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma created the clearer chances on xG (0.47 vs 1.48, Δ 1.01).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 0.47 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.48Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 535Lead | Accurate passes | 289 |
| 594Lead | Total passes | 351 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.54 | Goals prevented | -0.54 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.