Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 0.15, Δ 1.02).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (21 vs 4 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.15 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 401Lead | Accurate passes | 332 |
| 474Lead | Total passes | 403 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.