Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo created the clearer chances on xG (2.36 vs 0.30, Δ 2.06).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 2.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.30 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 346 | Accurate passes | 416Lead |
| 414 | Total passes | 471Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.31 | Goals prevented | 0.31 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |