Match statistics snapshot
- Internacional created the clearer chances on xG (0.62 vs 0.90, Δ 0.28).
- Internacional fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Internacional was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Internacional |
|---|---|---|
| 0.62 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Internacional |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 387Lead | Accurate passes | 213 |
| 458Lead | Total passes | 284 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Internacional |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Internacional |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.07 | Goals prevented | 0.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Internacional |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.