Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (23 vs 14 shots).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 7%).
- Sao Paulo held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 503Lead | Accurate passes | 161 |
| 573Lead | Total passes | 226 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sao Paulo | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.