Match statistics snapshot
- Sarpsborg 08 FF created the clearer chances on xG (3.97 vs 3.59, Δ 0.38).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 23%).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sarpsborg 08 Ff | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 3.97Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 3.59 |
| Offsides | ||
| 18 | Shots inside the box | 21Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 22 | Total shots | 22 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sarpsborg 08 Ff | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 235 | Accurate passes | 589Lead |
| 282 | Total passes | 658Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sarpsborg 08 Ff | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sarpsborg 08 Ff | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sarpsborg 08 Ff | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |