Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (2.13 vs 2.15, Δ 0.02).
- Sarpsborg 08 FF fired more attempts (27 vs 6 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sarpsborg 08 Ff | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 2.13 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.15Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sarpsborg 08 Ff | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 409Lead | Accurate passes | 123 |
| 478Lead | Total passes | 208 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sarpsborg 08 Ff | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sarpsborg 08 Ff | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sarpsborg 08 Ff | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |