Match statistics snapshot
- SC Freiburg created the clearer chances on xG (3.22 vs 0.83, Δ 2.39).
- SC Freiburg fired more attempts (24 vs 12 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sc Freiburg | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 3.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.83 |
| Offsides | ||
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8 | Shots on target | 8 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sc Freiburg | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 443 | Accurate passes | 472Lead |
| 546 | Total passes | 575Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sc Freiburg | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sc Freiburg | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 6 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sc Freiburg | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.