Match statistics snapshot
- SC Paderborn 07 created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 1.05, Δ 1.29).
- SC Paderborn 07 fired more attempts (19 vs 7 shots).
- Karlsruher SC was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sc Paderborn 07 | Statistic | Karlsruher Sc |
|---|---|---|
2.34Lead | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 1.05 |
2 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1Lead |
12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
19Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 7 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sc Paderborn 07 | Statistic | Karlsruher Sc |
|---|---|---|
49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
81% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
382 | Accurate passes | 405Lead |
470 | Total passes | 495Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sc Paderborn 07 | Statistic | Karlsruher Sc |
|---|---|---|
4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sc Paderborn 07 | Statistic | Karlsruher Sc |
|---|---|---|
5Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 0 |
2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
0.23 | Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. | 0.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sc Paderborn 07 | Statistic | Karlsruher Sc |
|---|---|---|
8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
0Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Karlsruher Sc leads this block
Karlsruher Sc leads shot accuracy (+81% vs Sc Paderborn 07)
Karlsruher Sc leads shot accuracy (+81% vs Sc Paderborn 07)
Karlsruher Sc leads shot quality (+22% vs Sc Paderborn 07)
Sc Paderborn 07 leads (63% vs 57%).
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Sc Paderborn 07 leads this block
Sc Paderborn 07 leads possession efficiency (+132% vs Karlsruher Sc)
Sc Paderborn 07 leads possession efficiency (+132% vs Karlsruher Sc)
Karlsruher Sc — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Sc Paderborn 07 leads this block
Sc Paderborn 07 leads territorial pressure (+200% vs Karlsruher Sc)
Sc Paderborn 07 leads territorial pressure (+200% vs Karlsruher Sc)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Karlsruher Sc — stronger shot quality allowed
Karlsruher Sc — stronger shot quality allowed
Sc Paderborn 07 leads (0.53 vs 0.47).
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Karlsruher Sc leads this block
Karlsruher Sc had the edge in 5 of 6 signals in this block.
Karlsruher Sc leads (20.0 vs 8.0).
Karlsruher Sc leads (41.8 vs 39.7).
Sc Paderborn 07 leads (16.0 vs 5.0).
Karlsruher Sc leads (0.150 vs 0.123).
Karlsruher Sc leads (87.7 vs 85.0).
Karlsruher Sc leads (15.0 vs 13.0).