Schoonbeek-Beverst 1-0 Zepperen-Brustem Prediction

Schoonbeek-BeverstSchoonbeek-Beverst
1 — 0FT
Zepperen-BrustemZepperen-Brustem

Updated

Match DNA · Predictions ↗

Open / transitional — too close to call

Estimated win chances: Schoonbeek-beverst 38.8%, draw 23.3%, Zepperen-brustem 37.9%. From 9 and 9 competition matches.

TempoHigh
VolatilityLow
Expected goalsHigh
Tactical styleOpen / transitional
Upset potentialMedium
Draw riskMedium
Model confidenceLow

Outcome model

Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.

Goal expectancy

1.63Expected goals1.61

From 9 and 9 competition matches

Likely scorelines (Poisson)

  • 1–110.8%
  • 2–18.8%
  • 1–28.7%
  • 2–27.1%
  • 1–06.7%

Form & momentum

Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.

40MixedSchoonbeek-beverst
Weighted momentum

Zepperen-brustem arrives with stronger form weighting (+43 momentum).

83Hot streakZepperen-brustem
Zepperen-brustem · hot form

Schoonbeek-beverst

4W · 1D · 4L
Recent →LDLWLWWLW
Momentum index

Zepperen-brustem

7W · 1D · 1L
Recent →WWWWDLWWW
Momentum index

Form split comparison

Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window

Season record

League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.

Table gapZepperen-brustem +9

Schoonbeek-beverst

13 pts
44% wins

4W · 1D · 4L · 9 played

For
17
Against
13
Goal diff +4

Zepperen-brustem

22 pts
78% wins

7W · 1D · 1L · 9 played

For
23
Against
11
Goal diff +12

Season shape comparison

League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals

League depth signals

Extremes, discipline windows, and split stats from the full league profile.

Matchup edges

Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.

  • Schoonbeek-beverst offensive edge

    Schoonbeek-beverst faces a stingier defense than their attack rating suggests.

    -21
  • Zepperen-brustem offensive edge

    Zepperen-brustem's attack (71%) vs Schoonbeek-beverst's defense (50%).

    +21

Team comparison

Comparison indices from the match data partner.

Attack rating

Attacking threat in the final third.

Schoonbeek-beverst29
Zepperen-brustem71

Defense rating

How well each side limits chances.

Schoonbeek-beverst50
Zepperen-brustem50

Momentum

Weighted form score (recent results count more).

Schoonbeek-beverst40
Zepperen-brustem83

Matchup edge

Attack vs opponent defense (positive = favourable matchup).

Schoonbeek-beverst8
Zepperen-brustem92

Volatility

Higher = more swingy results (big losses, goals against).

Schoonbeek-beverst30
Zepperen-brustem30

Form index

Head-to-head form comparison from the model.

Schoonbeek-beverst24
Zepperen-brustem76

H2H pull

Historical dominance in recent meetings.

Schoonbeek-beverst50
Zepperen-brustem50
Zepperen-brustemhot form

H2H in this snapshot

From 3 meetings included in this prediction snapshot.

0Schoonbeek-beverst0%
3Draws
0Zepperen-brustem0%

Recent meetings