Goal expectancy
1.63Expected goals1.39
From 4 and 4 competition matches
Likely scorelines (Poisson)
Schoonbeek-Beverst 2-1 Zepperen-Brustem Prediction
Open / transitional — model leans Schoonbeek-beverst
Estimated win chances: Schoonbeek-beverst 43.2%, draw 24%, Zepperen-brustem 32.7%. From 4 and 4 competition matches.
TempoHigh
VolatilityMedium
Expected goalsHigh
Tactical styleOpen / transitional
Upset potentialHigh
Draw riskMedium
Model confidenceMedium
Outcome model
Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.
Form & momentum
Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.
44MixedSchoonbeek-beverst
Weighted momentum
Schoonbeek-beverst carries the sharper recent run (+22 momentum).
22Cold spellZepperen-brustem
Schoonbeek-beverst · leaky defenseZepperen-brustem · High-risk / fragile
Schoonbeek-beverst
2W · 0D · 2LRecent →LWLW
Momentum index
Zepperen-brustem
1W · 0D · 3LRecent →LLWL
Momentum index
Form split comparison
Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window
Season record
League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.
Table gapSchoonbeek-beverst +3
Schoonbeek-beverst
6 pts50% wins
2W · 0D · 2L · 4 played
For6
Against8
Zepperen-brustem
3 pts25% wins
1W · 0D · 3L · 4 played
For6
Against7
Season shape comparison
League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals
League depth signals
Matchup edges
Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.
- Schoonbeek-beverst offensive edge
Schoonbeek-beverst faces a stingier defense than their attack rating suggests.
-3 - Zepperen-brustem offensive edge
Zepperen-brustem's attack (50%) vs Schoonbeek-beverst's defense (47%).
+3
Team comparison
Comparison indices from the match data partner.
Schoonbeek-beverstleaky defense
Zepperen-brustemHigh-risk / fragile
H2H in this snapshot
From 5 meetings included in this prediction snapshot.
1Schoonbeek-beverst20%
3Draws
1Zepperen-brustem20%