Match statistics snapshot
- Seattle Reign FC fired more attempts (17 vs 4 shots).
- North Carolina Courage W was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 35%).
- North Carolina Courage W held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Seattle Reign Fc | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Seattle Reign Fc | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 381 | Accurate passes | 499Lead |
| 476 | Total passes | 594Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Seattle Reign Fc | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Seattle Reign Fc | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Seattle Reign Fc | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |