Match statistics snapshot
- Seattle Sounders created the clearer chances on xG (2.21 vs 0.60, Δ 1.61).
- Seattle Sounders fired more attempts (20 vs 10 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Seattle Sounders | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 2.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60 |
| Offsides | ||
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Seattle Sounders | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 456Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 538Lead | Total passes | 243 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Seattle Sounders | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Seattle Sounders | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Seattle Sounders | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |