Match statistics snapshot
- Seraing United created the clearer chances on xG (0.82 vs 0.68, Δ 0.14).
- AS Eupen was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
- AS Eupen held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Seraing United | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 0.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Seraing United | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 211 | Accurate passes | 556Lead |
| 270 | Total passes | 635Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Seraing United | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Seraing United | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Seraing United | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.