Match statistics snapshot
- Rangers fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Servette FC was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 29%).
- Rangers held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Servette Fc | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Servette Fc | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 247 | Accurate passes | 326Lead |
| 346 | Total passes | 415Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Servette Fc | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Servette Fc | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Servette Fc | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |