Match statistics snapshot
- Celta Vigo fired more attempts (6 vs 5 shots).
- Celta Vigo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sestao River | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| 2Lead |
| 1 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 6Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sestao River | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 56% | Pass accuracy | 57%Lead |
| 196Lead | Accurate passes | 184 |
| 352Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sestao River | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sestao River | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sestao River | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.