Match statistics snapshot
- Sevilla created the clearer chances on xG (2.20 vs 1.99, Δ 0.21).
- Sevilla fired more attempts (19 vs 16 shots).
- Alaves was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sevilla | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
| 2.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.99 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sevilla | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 483Lead | Accurate passes | 177 |
| 564Lead | Total passes | 260 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sevilla | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sevilla | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sevilla | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |