Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 18%).
- Shamrock Rovers held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 530Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 586Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.