Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 30%).
- Shamrock Rovers held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 308 |
| 516Lead | Total passes | 381 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.