Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 0.64, Δ 1.25).
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- Shamrock Rovers held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 480Lead | Accurate passes | 198 |
| 574Lead | Total passes | 289 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shamrock Rovers | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.