Match statistics snapshot
- Shandong Luneng created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 1.02, Δ 0.15).
- Shandong Luneng fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Beijing Guoan was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 193 | Accurate passes | 297Lead |
| 310 | Total passes | 401Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 19Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |