Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (0.30 vs 1.96, Δ 1.66).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- Shandong Luneng was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 0.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.96Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 217 | Accurate passes | 371Lead |
| 313 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |