Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 2.66, Δ 1.70).
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (20 vs 11 shots).
- Wuhan Three Towns held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.66Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 220 | Accurate passes | 476Lead |
| 290 | Total passes | 551Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shandong Luneng | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |