Match statistics snapshot
- Beijing Guoan created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 2.71, Δ 1.24).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Beijing Guoan was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.71Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 417Lead | Accurate passes | 239 |
| 488Lead | Total passes | 330 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.