Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (3.10 vs 1.09, Δ 2.01).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Chengdu Better City was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 3.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 397Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 477Lead | Total passes | 307 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |