Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (2.39 vs 2.69, Δ 0.30).
- SHANGHAI SIPG held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 2.39 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.69Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 5 |
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 445Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 511Lead | Total passes | 266 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.